{5} Assigned, Active Tickets by Owner (Full Description) (13 matches)
List tickets assigned, group by ticket owner. This report demonstrates the use of full-row display.
marek (13 matches)
| Ticket | Summary | Component | Milestone | Type | Created | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Description | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| #136 | Nodes connecting to wrong network | dashboard | ng-beta | bug | 10/07/11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Greetings, We were asked by Open-Mesh Support to create a ticket here with regards to Open-Mesh ticket 601442 in reference to problems between two networks managed by CloudTrax?. We have two separate mesh networks, EDOW_200 and EDOW230 on login hfitadmin. The networks are physically adjacent to each other and use the same wired LAN (subnet) to connect to the internet gateway. The Mesh Gateways for EDOW_200 and EDOW_230 are assigned different IP address by the DHCP server. Everything on EDOW_230 works without a problem. The Mesh Gateway on EDOW_200 works fine. However each time we attempt to attach another mesh node to EDOW_200 the node connects to the Mesh Gateway on EDOW_230. We have block alien nodes checked on both networks in the Advanced options. If you look at the status details you see that the EDOW_200 node claims to be its own gateway yet its listed Mesh Gateway displays the IP of the Mesh Gateway of the EDOW_230 mesh gateway node. How do we stop the nodes we add to EDOW_200 from connecting to the EDOW_230 mesh gateway and connect correctly to the EDOW_200 mesh gateway? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| #19 | Ubiquiti Nano Station with NG stay on chanel 3 | firmware | ng-beta | bug | 09/11/10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I FLASH NANO STATION WITH THE NEW NG BUT NO CHECKING ON THE DASHBOARD ALSO STAY ON CHANEL 3 INSTEAD CHANEL 5 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| #20 | Engenius Antenna Configuration Support | firmware | ng-beta | bug | 09/30/10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Firmware defaults to 1 in etc/config/wireless, option 'txantenna' '1' option 'rxantenna' '1' Would like to see a script that would recognize leading digits of the MAC of the Engenius AP's, 00:02:6F, and automatically configure the rx/tx settings to a 2 for these devices. Each node must be setup as a gateway currently to allow ssh access, and the update applied manually to each node. fw-ng-r244 Thanks, Tony |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| #40 | Spanning Tree Protocol / Bridge Mode | firmware | ng-beta | bug | 02/10/11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm encountering something like bug #32, but different enough that I thought it should be it's own ticket. I have 5 OM1P's running r265, three as gateways, two as repeaters, all in the same mesh area. They are set in bridged mode, so that we can hand out IPs from our DHCP server as well as allow domain authentication on the computers using wireless. This works fine with one gateway hooked up, but a few minutes after I boot up any of the other gateways, access to the LAN/Internet becomes very spotty. (I can still connect to the APs, but on SSID#2 I get no IP address and on SSID#1, I cannot access any LAN resources.) I'm guessing Spanning Tree Protocol is being triggered on our Cisco switches due to a broadcast storm or it detecting the mesh as an Ethernet loop. Leaving it up and running overnight showed very spotty checkins, it looked like the gateways connection to the LAN was constantly going up and down. If I remove all but one gateway, everything works fine. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| #66 | creating new network after session has expired | dashboard | ng-beta | bug | 03/29/11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I created a master login, then created two networks: Network 1: kodlth Network 2: redmug If I log in with network creds, everything appears ok. If I log in with the master account, I see the network drop down, but it shows kodlth twice and doesn't show redmug. Image attached. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| #37 | Client Isolation not yet implemented in NG as of r265 | firmware | ng-beta | feature | 01/26/11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi, I know Client Isolation (AP Isolation) is not yet implemented in NG. Clients associated with any node in the mesh are visible to all other clients throughout the mesh. I can't deploy even a test network with NG due to this. I have a network running at my home with 3 wifi cameras streaming to a local server, and am impressed with NG in general, but I can't deploy it for enduser use until Isolation is implemented. Looking forward to when you're able to implement Isolation between clients associated with AP1. Hope to provide some more useful feedback at that time. thanks. -Dale |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| #100 | Maintain private LAN connectivity even when the internet is unavailable | firmware | ng-beta | feature | 06/02/11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
We have deployed five OM1P routers on a customer’s site, and these 5 units have been patched with the latest NG beta firmware and work great (while connected to the internet). Unfortunately the client’s site has less then perfect connectivity to the internet. The ISP is working on this. We need to maintain connectivity to the private 192.168.0.x LAN. I think it's possible to spoof the IPs / sites the routers check in order to maintain the illusion that they are still have access to the internet and thus maintain the local area network connection. But this is not easily done in the client's environment. Can an option be added to relax or ignore the internet check-in process, so as to maintain LAN connectivity even if the internet is not available? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| #195 | Wired clients fail if static IP | firmware | ng-beta | feature | 01/24/12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
OM2p system, with 4 nodes, one gateway. The 3 remote nodes have client systems attached. NG mode, SSID2 bridged, wired bridged. They are POS terminals at a bar - all use the same subnet. All POS terminals are on Static IP. Turns out - that unless at least one device does a dhcp request on a wired port of an OM2P - the static IP devices cannot communicate. So unless there is one DHCP packet after an OM2P resync - the network fails. In the lab we had a dhcp client device so it worked. In a panic, we have added a managed switch on the OM2P remote wired port that will create that DHCP packet - but we have to reboot that switch - so it does dhcp - often. I could find no mention that wired remote only works if there is a recent DHCP request. A wireshark capture of the OM2P wired port shows that until one DHCP request arrives, the OM2P device is doing DHCP requests itself on the wired port - and getting no response. So - if the OM2P gets no response to DHCP on the wired port - why not assume it is a wired remote and start handling client traffic? At this point we need to remove the OM2P and install WDS AP devices to allow static IP devices to route consistently - what a disappointment! |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| #149 | Vlan Tagging not working | firmware | ng-beta | bug | 11/07/11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have the new r330 firmware on all of my MR500 beta units. I have HP procurve 5412zl switches with multiple vlans on them. I am trying to setup vlan tagging on SSID 1. I have placed 2 vlans on my switchs on the ports for my MR500's one is vlan 40 and it is untagged and the other is vlan 16 and it is tagged. When I set SSID 1 to be on vlan 16 and SSID 2 to be bridged (with no vlan listed) SSID 2 works fine but ssid one will not had out DHCP address from the DHCP server that is running on vlan 16. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| #23 | Bridge both SSID#1 and SSID#2 | firmware | ng-beta | feature | 10/27/10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
would it be possible to bridge both SSIDs to different LANs? Lets say they have a separated backbone for there access points but employees would like to access local resources. Could it be done by VLAN tagging or by setting SUBNET for "guest LAN" and "private LAN" on the dashboard and hock one node to the "GUEST LAN" and another to the "PRIVATE LAN". And routing could be setup from the IP the unit receives? Bridge for SSID#1 is a "MUST" for many of our customers as they alrady have invested in AAA systems. Bridge for SSID#2 is nice |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| #30 | Add button to view list of SSID#2 users and stats | firmware | ng-beta | feature | 12/20/10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I would like to be able to get the same stats for SSID#2 that is available for SSID#1 users from the dashboard. i.e. MAC address of users connected w/i the last 24 hours, bandwidth used, etc. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| #43 | add dashboard option to schedule OTA upgrade | dashboard | ng-beta | feature | 02/14/11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I would like to know the procedure to do a controlled OTA upgrade. Is there some commands that can force an OTA upgrade so I can upgrade my nodes one at a time? This would help since I can control the upgrade of these units without affecting users. Thanks |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| #47 | Show active vs past users | dashboard | ng-beta | feature | 02/20/11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On the dashboard, it would be useful to see who is active vs past users when you click the "SSID#1 Clients" link. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
